The image above is exactly how I shot it with no post manipulation. It's actually the JPG file from the camera (shot RAW also) that I simply resized to 950 width as you see above. Trust me, the larger image file doesn't enhance the noise when viewed full screen.
The image above was shot with the Canon 1DX Mark II at 6400 ISO using the Canon 24mm f/1.4 lens set at f/1.4 handheld. I had a single focal point on the right eye of the subject. I wanted to see how the camera performed in low light at 6400 ISO (it was pretty dark outside at night) and I must say that I was impressed.
Yes, if you zoom in and look hard, you can likely nit pick the image to death and say "blah, blah, blah" which I personally get tired of the know it alls (think they do) on social media (mostly in the comments section). However, for an image that has ZERO post editing or noise reduction, I think it's pretty solid.
Since I shoot on a very regular basis in low light, I typically use a speedlight to compensate. However, there are times that a speedlight is not appropriate. It's for these times that I really need the extra ISO boost without the extra noise. It is very rare that I would need to go beyond 6400 ISO which is a key reason that I chose 6400 for this shot.
Yes, there are other cameras on the market that will do a great job at 6400 ISO and for less than $5,995. But this is not about the other cameras. It is meant to show those that are curious about how the Canon 1DX Mark II will perform in low light. There are numerous other features to the Canon 1DX Mark II beyond just the low light performance. You'll have to decide for yourself if the $5,995 price tag along with the specifications of Canon's flagship camera makes it a fit for you. If you are a full time sports photographer that makes your living shooting action, this camera could be a good fit for you if the price is within your budget.
Nikon's D5 flagship is about $500 more. So anyone seriously looking at one of these two cameras likely already has an investment into Canon or Nikon.
As a Platinum Canon Professional Services Member, I used the Canon 1DX Mark II through the evaluation program which means Canon sent it to me for FREE to test out. I must say that I really liked the camera, but for what I shoot, the $5,995 price just doesn't make good business sense. However, I am seriously considering the Canon 5D Mark IV to replace my workhorse 5D Mark III. That's another blog post.
Latest posts by David Williams (see all)
- Canon C300 Mark II – Cannon Tutorials Plus Two Bonus Videos - August 13, 2017
- Functions Of The Canon 5D Mark IV – 4 Part Video Series - August 13, 2017
- Getting The Canon 5D Mark IV – Several Months After The Release - June 17, 2017
- Attracting & Retaining The Right Clients For Your Photography and/or Video Business - February 16, 2017
- Your Photography & Video Pricing Strategy For 2017 In The Raleigh NC Market - January 15, 2017